Skip to content

CASE STUDY

Oxygen achieves massive company-wide productivity increase through AI (GPT-4) integration

As pioneers in the tech space, Oxygen quickly recognised the untapped potential of OpenAI's GPT-4, not just in English but also in Mandarin and Cantonese. This case study delves deep into Oxygen's accelerated adoption of GPT-4, how we reshaped our content creation dynamics, supercharging efficiencies and how we are setting a benchmark for the industry in the region.

img-case-study-ai-chatgpt-interface-1

How we facilitated learning and adoption

chatgpt-case-study-uses-img

1. Business-wide access to the best tools

We evaluated all of the AI LLM tools available and came to the clear conclusion that GPT-4 provided the best possible quality for the team with direct access (instead of through another platform that uses GTP-4 like POE).

Ai-workshop-img

2. Group training sessions

Each month, we ran multiple AI training sessions via video call and in-person during our team events. These started quite basic, on understanding prompts and how to use the interface… eventually progressing to be more advanced, covering topics like token limits, code interpreter mode and mermaid coding via GPT.

chatgpt4-uses-img

3. Company-wide buy-in

Everyone at Oxygen, regardless of role or position, was encouraged to use GPT as much as possible to improve efficiency without impacting quality. Managers were required to be experts in AI to provide better training and help with any questions the rest of the team might have.

ai-charter-img

4. AI Charter

We drafted an AI Charter for our team to sign. Essentially, making it clear that while AI use is encouraged, misuse will not be tolerated. This document also clarifies that employees are responsible for ALL AI outputs and, therefore, must personally check everything written by ChatGPT. By signing this charter, our team also agrees that all content must have some element of human editing or influence not to seem generic or a departure from our brand tone of voice.

5. AI Certification Program

5. AI Certification Program

We have developed two certification programs, as the first had to be rewritten 2 months later due to all of the changes within the industry and the tools we were using. These exams test knowledge of the technology behind AI, understanding of the tool, and best-practise ways to use AI to generate amazing results.

Project Management Data

The data on the right is a raw export from our project management system. We looked at hundreds of separate tasks and thousands of collective hours logged to get this data. We focused on one of our core deliverables, which, while sold often, has rarely been profitable. While the below example is just one of many deliverables at Oxygen, further digging into the data showed similar (if not better) results for other tasks.

img-case-study-ai-project-management-data

Average time logged per specific deliverable

we found that AI training and implementation led to a 48.5% reduction in time spent on one of our core services.

We further clarified with project managers, and there was no apparent decrease in quality or increase in client revisions during this period of change. Content from our latest campaign (Client #3) is also 23% more effective for traffic generation than our previous campaign, written manually before AI implementation.

Client #1: Average time logged

Before

10h 43m

After

6h 53m

Client #2: Average time logged

Before

12h 16m

After

4h 40m

Client #3: Average time logged

Before

6h 13m

After

3h 32m

Total Average

Before

9h 44m

After

5h 01m

Quantitative Results

img-case-study-ai-metric-brainstorming

Metric: Time spent brainstorming content ideas each week

There was an increase of approximately 26.6% in respondents who spent "less than 5 hours" each week brainstorming content after the AI implementation compared to before.

img-case-study-ai-metric-writing-content

Metric: Time spent creating written content each week

There was an increase of approximately 26.8% in respondents who spent "less than 5 hours" creating written content each week after the AI implementation compared to before.

img-case-study-ai-metric-overhelmed

Metric: How often do you feel overwhelmed with work?

There was a decrease of approximately 49% in the respondents who said they 'often' feel overwhelmed after AI implementation compared to before.

Qualitative Results

Not satisfied with the results purely from a time-saving perspective, our team was also surveyed on their confidence in creating their own quality content and the quality of their teammate’s work since AI implementation.

Note that responses for this survey are from a highly self-aware team that are always seeking to improve their writing skills.

Metric: Confidence level in creating high-quality written content without peer review

Before AI After AI
Extremely Confident 5.3% 6.7%
Somewhat Confident 52.6% 53.3%
Unsure 26.3% 33.3%
Not that confident 15.8% 6.7%

Metric: Confidence in colleagues’ ability to create high-quality written content without peer review

Before AI After AI
Extremely Confident 5.3% 6.7%
Somewhat Confident 52.6% 73.3%
Unsure 42.1% 20%
Not that confident 0 0

Impact on the team

img-case-study-ai-survey

Key learnings & challenges

  • Practical use of the tools and peer review of output was the fastest driver of AI adoption and proficiency. Teams could quickly compare results and help colleagues find flaws and solutions by using AI. Review sessions were an important part of this and without oversight from management, this wouldn’t have happened so quickly.

  • Only giving teams access to the tools is not enough. After suggesting that many of our clients start using ChatGPT, we found that the quality of their output decreased as they didn’t have sufficient training to get good results or even to benchmark what a good result might be. Teams must understand how to use the AI tools, and which tasks might not be appropriate for automation in this way, in order to get an optimal result.

  • Management should never penalise someone for just using ChatGPT for a task. But must always penalise someone if the quality of that output is not good enough. Ultimately, they are responsible for that output, and a response like “Well, that’s what ChatGPT gave me” will not suffice.

Ready to get started?

As a digital marketing agency and HubSpot partner in Hong Kong. we are uniquely positioned to help bridge the gap between the East and West.